Best Tools to Turn Markdown into a Website (Plus an Easier Alternative)

Markdown has become the go-to format for writers, developers, and documentarians. It's clean, readable, and easy to write. But what if you want to turn those plain text .md files into a website?

Good news — you have options. Whether you're documenting a project, starting a blog, or building a personal knowledge base, there are several tools that can take your Markdown files and publish them as a functional website. Let’s walk through some of the most popular approaches and how hosted.md is trying to make this process less of a chore.

1. Jekyll

Jekyll is one of the oldest and most popular static site generators for Markdown. Originally built to power GitHub Pages, it takes Markdown files and turns them into static HTML. It uses layouts, includes, and variables, giving you a lot of control over how your site looks.

Pros:

• Deep GitHub Pages integration.
• Lots of themes and plugins.

Cons:

• Requires a local Ruby setup.
• Can feel overcomplicated if you just want to publish Markdown quickly.

2. Hugo

Hugo has gained a reputation for being one of the fastest static site generators out there. Written in Go, it can build massive websites in seconds. Like Jekyll, Hugo uses templates and front matter to add structure and metadata to your Markdown files.

Pros:

• Blazing fast builds.
• Good theme ecosystem.

Cons:

• Steeper learning curve if you're not familiar with its templating system.
• Setting up and deploying can feel heavy-handed for small sites.

3. MkDocs

MkDocs is aimed squarely at documentation sites. It keeps things simple: write Markdown, configure your mkdocs.yml file, and you get a nice-looking site.

Pros:

• Dead simple for documentation.
• Clean, minimal themes.

Cons:

• Less suited for blogs or creative projects.
• Customization is more limited compared to Jekyll or Hugo.

4. Static Site Generators + Custom Hosting

Many people build their site using tools like Jekyll or Hugo and then upload the output to their own hosting or services like Netlify or Vercel. This gives you flexibility, but it also means managing builds, configuring DNS, and handling deployments.

Pros:

• Full control over hosting and configuration.
• You can mix tools as needed.

Cons:

• More moving parts.
• Not beginner-friendly.

5. hosted.md: The No-Setup Approach

This is where hosted.md comes in. The goal is to let you upload Markdown files or connect a Git repo and get a live website without worrying about setting up generators, builds, or deployments. You focus on writing Markdown. We handle the rest — from turning it into a static site to hosting it behind a CDN.

How it’s different:

• No local builds or CLI tools.
• Built-in themes you can pick from or customize.
• Automatic publishing to your subdomain (with custom domain support if you want it).
• Markdown stays Markdown — you don’t have to learn templating languages or front matter if you don’t want to.

In short, hosted.md tries to cut through the noise for folks who just want to get their Markdown online without wrestling with tools designed for developers.

---

Conclusion

There’s no shortage of ways to turn Markdown into a website. Whether you love tinkering with config files or just want to write and publish, the right option depends on your workflow and what you want out of your site.

If you're the type who wants to focus on the content and skip the overhead, hosted.md might be the path of least resistance.